Asthma in the Biologics Era: Should Oral Corticosteroid Therapy Be Relegated to History?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40222631.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.04.007.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Oral corticosteroids (OCS) have been used for both maintenance and burst treatment of asthma since the 1950s owing to their beneficial effect on symptoms and exacerbations coupled with a historical lack of alternative therapies. Despite the current availability of well-tolerated and effective treatment with biologics, chronic OCS use remains high. This is of great concern because evidence suggests that a lifetime cumulative exposure even as low as 0.5 to 1.0 g prednisolone equivalent (about three to four bursts of OCS) significantly increases the risk of a wide range of acute and long-term adverse effects, some of which may not be fully reversible. Conversely, biologics have demonstrated a more favorable benefit-risk profile compared with OCS, while reducing exacerbations and improving symptom control. Here, we review the current situation, highlight the need for improved stewardship of OCS use, describe the cumulative and potentially irreversible toxicity seen with even short bursts of OCS, and discuss the role of biologics in minimizing their use. Finally, we provide our opinion on how maintenance OCS therapy in asthma can be relegated to history, with early patient risk evaluation to identify and measure biomarkers and/or clinical traits that may predict risk of future exacerbations, enabling proactive preventative intervention.
Medical subject headings
- Asthma
- Biological Products
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents