O(N)×O(2) scalar models: Including O(∂^{2}) corrections in the functional renormalization group analysis.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40247474.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.111.034104.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The study of phase transitions in frustrated magnetic systems with O(N)×O(2) symmetry has been the subject of controversy for more than 20 years, with theoretical, numerical, and experimental results in disagreement. Even theoretical studies led to different results, with some predicting a first-order phase transition while others found it to be second-order. Recently, a series of results from both numerical simulations and theoretical analyses, in particular those based on the Conformal Bootstrap, have rekindled interest in this controversy, especially as they are still not in agreement with each other. Studies based on the functional renormalization group have played a major role in this controversy in the past, and we revisit these studies, taking them a step further by adding nontrivial second-order derivative terms to the derivative expansion of the effective action. We confirm the first-order nature of the phase transition for physical values of N, i.e., for N=2 and 3, in agreement with the latest results obtained with the Conformal Bootstrap. We also study another phase of the O(N)×O(2) models, called the sinusoidal phase, qualitatively confirming earlier perturbative results.