Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Treatment of Advanced Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40251951.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.28167 and PMC identifier 12377915.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This review aims to compare survival outcomes of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of advanced-stage OPSCC. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus were searched. Studies comparing the survival of patients with advanced OPSCC treated surgically (±adjuvant therapy) or non-surgically were included. Meta-analyses hazard ratio (HR) and proportions (%) were performed for the outcomes of 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall (OS), disease-free (DFS), disease-specific (DSS), and relapse-free (RFS) survival. Forty-four studies reporting on (N = 35 681) patients were included, with a mean age of 58.9. For advanced-stage disease, primary treatment with surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated the best 5-year OS, at 67.1% (95% CI 55.6-77.6). Survival outcomes favored Surgery + CRT over other primary treatment modalities. Surgical treatment with adjuvant CRT may be associated with better OS outcomes compared with non-surgical treatment. Further research is needed to determine superior treatment modalities in OPSCC subgroups, such as HPV+ tumors.
Medical subject headings
- Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell