Pragmatic Clinical Trials in Neurology.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40260697.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/ana.27244.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The need for pragmatic clinical trials evaluating therapeutic interventions in patients with neurological disease is continually increasing due to availability of multiple therapeutic interventions (comparative effectiveness), multifaceted approaches (multiple concurrent synergistic therapeutic interventions), and gaps in trial-specific and real-world population outcomes. Several designs for pragmatic trials are available, including individual randomized trials with pragmatic characteristics, cluster-randomized and non-randomized trials, and observational prospective cohort studies. Cluster trials may have parallel cluster and crossover (unidirectional, bidirectional, and alternating crossover) designs. There are unique aspects of consenting and data collection leveraging existing registries, electronic health records (EHRs), and claims data that make pragmatic trials most suited to study the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in patients with neurological diseases in real-world settings. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:1022-1037.
Medical subject headings
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
- Neurology
- Nervous System Diseases