Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40267970.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2 and PMC identifier 12353792.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly transforming medical applications. However, proprietary models such as GPT-4o face significant barriers to clinical adoption because they cannot be deployed on site within healthcare institutions, making them noncompliant with stringent privacy regulations. Recent advancements in open-source LLMs such as DeepSeek models offer a promising alternative because they allow efficient fine-tuning on local data in hospitals with advanced information technology infrastructure. Here, to demonstrate the clinical utility of DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, we benchmarked their performance on clinical decision support tasks against proprietary LLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental. Using 125 patient cases with sufficient statistical power, covering a broad range of frequent and rare diseases, we found that DeepSeek models perform equally well and in some cases better than proprietary LLMs. Our study demonstrates that open-source LLMs can provide a scalable pathway for secure model training enabling real-world medical applications in accordance with data privacy and healthcare regulations.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Decision Support Systems, Clinical
- Benchmarking