Disability-inclusive graduation programme intervention on social participation among ultra-poor people with disability in North Uganda: a cluster randomized trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40307860.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1186/s12916-025-04100-3 and PMC identifier 12044952.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
People with disabilities encounter significant barriers to social participation due to inaccessible environments and negative attitudes. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a comprehensive disability-inclusive graduation (DIG) programme in enhancing social participation among ultra-poor people with disabilities in rural Uganda. A two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in four Northern Ugandan districts, involving 96 intervention and 89 control clusters. The DIG intervention encompassed four pillars: Livelihoods, Social Protection, Financial Inclusion, and Social Empowerment. The study identified households with disabilities using the Washington Group Short Set questions, verified by BRAC programme managers, comprising 370 working-age people with disabilities in the intervention group and 321 in the control group at baseline. Treatment clusters received an 18-month DIG intervention from December 2020 to June 2022. Social participation was measured using the SINTEF Participation Question Set at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 16 months post-intervention, covering household and societal participation domains. Intervention effects were analyzed through linear mixed-effects regression models, reporting minimally adjusted and fully adjusted mean differences (MAMD and FAMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Immediately after the intervention, the DIG programme showed a positive trend in overall social participation (3.04 point increase in intervention group vs. - 0.29 in control), though not statistically significant in fully adjusted analysis (FAMD = 3.14, 95% CI = (- 1.26, 7.54); p = 0.17), possibly due to sample size limitations and variability in individual responses. A larger improvement in societal participation was observed favouring the intervention group (5.92 point increase versus 0.21 in control), with the fully adjusted analysis approaching statistical significance (FAMD = 5.84, 95% CI = (- 0.01, 11.69); p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in the domain of household participation. At 16 months post-intervention, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups in overall scores or any subdomain, suggesting challenges in maintaining initial improvements over time. The DIG programme showed short-term positive effects on social participation among ultra-poor people with disabilities, especially in societal engagement. The absence of long-term sustained improvements underscores the complexity of disability inclusion in resource-constrained settings. Future interventions should develop strategies like extended support or booster sessions to maintain initial gains. Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (RIDIE-STUDY-ID-626008898983a) and ISRCTN (ISRCTN-78592382).
Medical subject headings
- Persons with Disabilities
- Poverty
- Social Participation