Examining the Relationship Between Relative Value Units and Patient-reported Outcomes: Implications for Value-based Care.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40344652.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01297.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Compensation based on work relative value unit (wRVU) production is common among orthopaedic surgeons. With increased adoption of value-based payments, a greater portion of surgeon compensation will be linked to quality and outcome measures-including patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between wRVUs and changes in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores to assess whether wRVUs could serve as a marker of patient-reported functional improvements. A retrospective review of 2,996 orthopaedic surgeries at a single institution was done. Patient characteristics, total wRVUs billed by the surgeon for the case, operating room (OR) time, and change in PROMIS-PF scores from baseline to 6 months postoperatively were compared across subspecialties. Pearson correlation and multivariable linear regression were used to assess the relationship between wRVUs, OR time, and PROMIS-PF change. Statistically significant differences in average wRVUs, OR times, and PROMIS-PF scores were observed across subspecialties. A strong positive correlation between wRVUs and OR time existed ( r = 0.732, P < 0.001) that explained approximately 54% of OR-time variability. A weak positive correlation between wRVUs and change in PROMIS-PF scores was observed ( r = 0.058, P = 0.002) that explained <1% of the variation. Each 1-point increase in wRVU was associated with a 3-minute increase in surgical duration (β = 3.04, P < 0.001) after controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and subspecialty, accounting for approximately 63% of OR-time variation. Each 1-point increase in wRVU was independently associated with a 0.02-point increase in PROMIS-PF change (β = 0.02, P = 0.036), explaining approximately 7% of the variation. Across orthopaedic subspecialties, notable variability in both wRVUs and physical function improvements at 6 months postoperatively exists. Although highly correlated with surgical time, wRVUs show little association with functional improvement across subspecialties. As the transition toward value-based payment models continues, measurement of and compensation for work complexity and functional outcomes must remain separate and distinct.
Medical subject headings
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Relative Value Scales
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Orthopedic Surgeons