The effect of extrinsic feedback on improving functioning in people with congenital and acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40346794.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2025.2497461.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Estimating the effect of extrinsic feedback (EF) on functional recovery, functional skill acquisition, and motor learning in individuals with brain injuries. Systematic review and meta-analysis using databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials searched on January 2024. Eligible trials compared motor training with EF provision to no EF provision or with different EF content. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis synthesized the results. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. 51 controlled trials, including 1,451 participants. No significant EF effect for children and teenagers with cerebral palsy (CP). Among adults with stroke, EF showed a large effect on functional recovery (SMD 1.03, 95% CI [0.13; 1.93]) and a moderate effect on motor learning (SMD 0.52, 95% CI [0.35; 0.69]). High to moderate evidence for a large to moderate effect of EF on functional recovery and motor learning in adults with stroke. Effectiveness for children, adolescents, and adults with congenital and traumatic brain injury lacks evidence. Comprehensive meta-analytic synthesis of different EF content was not possible. PROSPERO CRD42022327646.
Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
- Stroke Rehabilitation