Comparison of Myopic Maculopathy Progression in Patients with Myopic Traction Maculopathy undergoing Vitrectomy or Macular Buckling.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40359481.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004521.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the progression of myopic maculopathy in patients with stage 3 myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) undergoing either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or macular buckling (MB). A total of 61 eyes diagnosed with stage 3 MTM were retrospectively divided into two groups: PPV group (30 eyes) and MB group (31 eyes). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AL), myopic maculopathy progression, retinal and choroidal thickness were measured and compared. The mean follow-up period was 70.9±13.67 months. The average myopic maculopathy stage in the PPV group progressed from 1.87±0.57 to 2.4±0.72 (P < 0.001). In the MB group, the stage advanced from 2.03±0.66 to 2.1±0.7 (P = 0.5). Progression to a different stage occurred in 14 eyes (46.67%) in the PPV group, compared to only 2 eyes (6.45%) in the MB group. 16.67% of eyes in the PPV group (5 out of 30) and 6.45% of eyes in the MB group (2 out of 31) showed progression within the same MM stage. Additionally, 9 eyes (29.03%) in the MB group exhibited retinal pigment epithelium injury adjacent to the macular buckle ridge (MB-related atrophy). Postoperatively, foveal retinal thickness (197.8±61.53 μm vs. 164.4±49.07 μm, P = 0.02) and central choroidal thickness (81.95±47.7 μm vs. 61.44±50.77 μm, P = 0.032) were significantly greater in the MB group. For patients with stage 3 MTM, PPV may accelerate the progression of myopic maculopathy, whereas MB may not. Therefore, MB may be a preferable surgical option for these patients.