Global disparities in indoor wildfire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and mitigation costs.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40367153.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/sciadv.ads4360 and PMC identifier 12077487.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Wildfires have become more frequent and severe, and evidence showed that exposure to wildfire-caused PM<sub>2.5</sub> (fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is associated with adverse health effects. Fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure occurs mainly indoors, where people spend most of their time. As an effective and timely approach of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution, air purifiers incur notable associated costs. However, the long-term global population exposure to indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> and the economic burden of using air purifiers remain unknown. Here, we estimated the indoor fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration and the cost of reducing indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, along with the extra cost incurred because of fire-PM<sub>2.5</sub>, at a resolution of 0.5° by 0.5° globally during 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed 1009 million individuals exposed to at least one substantial indoor wildfire-air pollution day per year. We identified pronounced socioeconomic disparities in the costs of mitigating indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, with low-income countries bearing a disproportionately higher economic burden, emphasizing the critical need for addressing these disparities.
Medical subject headings
- Wildfires
- Particulate Matter
- Air Pollution, Indoor
- Environmental Exposure