Are Open Distal Tibia Fractures More Severe Injuries Than Open Tibial Shaft Fractures in Children?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40391886.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BPO.0000000000003013 and PMC identifier 12410081.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare a cohort of pediatric open distal tibia fractures to open tibial shaft fractures regarding demographics and treatment outcomes. This is a retrospective review of 39 open distal tibia fractures (D group) and 55 open tibia shaft fractures (S group), treated from January 2007 to May 2017 at a single level 1 pediatric trauma center. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare means between groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding demographics, injury mechanism, or injury severity scores. While the D group had nearly 4x times the rate of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) compared with the S group [15% (6/39) vs. 4% (2/54)] and twice the rate of external fixation [15% (6/39) vs. 7% (4/54)], these were not statistically significant ( P >0.05). D group had more Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures compared with S group [46% (18/39) vs. 26% (14/54), P =0.04], longer mean operative times (2.5 vs. 2.1 h, P =0.04), longer hospitalization (8.7 vs. 6.5 d, P =0.01), and longer time to full weight-bearing (11.4 vs. 7.2 wk, P =0.03). Postoperative complications (delayed union, limb length discrepancy, infection) were similar between the 2 groups, although D group had nearly twice the rate of return to the operating room after index surgery [49% (19/39) vs. 26% (14/54), P =0.03]. Although over twice as many fractures in D group required a free flap compared with S group [18% (7/39) vs. 7% (4/54)], this did not reach statistical significance ( P >0.05). Two patients in each group eventually underwent amputation; all patients had Gustilo-Anderson IIIB or IIIC fractures. Radiographic angulation at final follow-up was similar between the 2 groups ( P >0.05). This study highlights the challenges in treating open distal tibia fractures compared with open tibial shaft fractures. Families should be counselled on a possibly prolonged treatment course, both inpatient and postoperatively, when patients sustain an open distal tibia fracture. Level III-retrospective comparative study.
Medical subject headings
- Tibial Fractures
- Hospitalization
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Open Fracture Reduction
- Postoperative Complications
Anatomy
- tibia