A tailored implementation intervention is successful in sustaining a stroke circuit class in a regional setting.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40405598.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2025.2508403.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Guidelines recommend circuit classes to improve mobility after stroke. This study aimed to develop, deliver and evaluate an intervention to sustain a lower limb stroke circuit class in a regional setting in Australia. This implementation study was guided by the Knowledge to Action framework with four phases. Phase 1: review of current circuit class practice. Phase 2: evaluation of health professional barriers and facilitators. Phase 3: development and delivery of a tailored implementation intervention based on the needs of health professionals. Phase 4: evaluation of sustainability and class outcomes. Phase 1: audit showed circuit classes had low attendance (<i>n</i> = 22/month). Phase 2: health professional participants (<i>n</i> = 21) identified key barriers and facilitators to delivering the circuit class, including a lack of training and confidence. Phase 3: the implementation intervention involved role modelling and training of health professionals conducting the class. Phase 4: average circuit class attendance increased and was maintained at follow-up (<i>n</i> = 32/month during intervention, <i>n</i> = 33/month post-intervention). Health professionals' confidence in others conducting the circuit class increased (43% pre-intervention to 92% post-intervention). A tailored implementation intervention for health professionals in a regional community setting improved sustainability and increased confidence in conducting circuit classes for people with stroke.
Medical subject headings
- Stroke Rehabilitation
- Exercise Therapy