Post-pulmonary tuberculosis lung function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40412395.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00105-6 and PMC identifier 12287636.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Although post-tuberculosis lung disease poses a substantial threat to individuals who have recovered from pulmonary tuberculosis, data showing objective functional impairment in such people are scarce. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate respiratory impairment after pulmonary tuberculosis disease and examine differences in ventilatory defects. We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 13, 2024. We included any study design with data on lung function tests in individuals with a previous diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis versus healthy controls. Outcomes extracted from eligible studies included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV<sub>1</sub> as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV<sub>1</sub>%), FVC as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%), and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio. Pre-bronchodilator values were preferentially selected. Random effects mean difference models were used when possible and standardised mean difference where it was necessary to standardise to a single scale (ie, FEV<sub>1</sub>%, FVC%, and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio). Between-study heterogeneity was estimated with I<sup>2</sup>. This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021248838). Of the 5594 publications found, data from 19 studies were included for meta-analyses, reporting on 75 960 individuals of whom 7447 had past pulmonary tuberculosis. All studies reporting absolute values, using various levels of adjustment or standardisation, showed that previous pulmonary tuberculosis had a negative effect across all spirometric values: FEV<sub>1</sub> -0·41 L (95% CI -0·51 to -0·32, I<sup>2</sup>=90·4%), FVC -0·25 L (-0·33 to -0·17, I<sup>2</sup>=80·6%), and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio -0·37 (-0·54 to -0·19, I<sup>2</sup>=92·0%). In those studies, using reference values to derive FEV<sub>1</sub>% and FVC %, prior pulmonary tuberculosis had a pooled standardised mean difference of -0·44 (-0·60 to -0·28, I<sup>2</sup>=95·6%) and -0·33 (-0·54 to -0·13, I<sup>2</sup>=91·3%), respectively, compared with controls. People who recover from pulmonary tuberculosis have significantly decreased lung function compared with controls, with FEV<sub>1</sub> more affected than FVC, giving a mixed obstructive and restrictive picture with predominantly airflow obstruction. Breathing Matters.
Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
- Lung