Management Guidelines for Anterior Column Reconstruction in Spinal Tuberculosis - A Comparative Outcome Analysis.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40420605.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005403.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Retrospective Comparative Study. A comparative analysis was aimed at evaluating the clinical and radiological outcomes of cases managed with versus without ACR. Management of spinal tuberculosis (STB) is accomplished with or without anterior column reconstruction (ACR). However, no objective criterion has been defined citing absolute indication. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of STB was carried out with a minimum follow-up of one year. Along with basic demography, radiological parameters like vertebral body height loss (VHL), column height loss (CHL), segmental kyphosis (SK), adjusted kyphosis (AK) were calculated. A ROC curve analysis was done to identify cut-off values, followed by subgroup analysis for each parameter. In total 103 patients (60 female, 43 male), 55 cases were managed operatively and ACR was done in 39 of those. Change in ODI, VHL, and kyphosis correction were significantly better in ACR (P<0.01). ROC analysis identified cut-off values for VHL 0.55 (Sensitivity 0.87, 1-specificity 0.37), CHL 1.12 (Sensitivity 0.76, 1-specificity 0.25), and AK 15° (Sensitivity 0.74, 1-specificity 0.43). Subgroup analysis was carried out in operated patients segregated above these cutoff values. Though vertebral height gain was better with ACR, no significant differences across the change in ODI and loss of correction were noted between ACR vs N-ACR. However, the instruments to disease vertebrae (I/D) ratio was significantly different across all subgroups (P<0.05). A similar functional outcome, kyphosis correction, and mechanical stability (loss of correction) can be achieved without ACR if index screw purchase with increasing the implant density is feasible. In cases where the index screw deems impossible, the objective criteria of VHL ≥0.55, CHL ≥1.1, and AK ≥150 should be considered for deciding the need for anterior column reconstruction to achieve better outcomes. III.
Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Spinal
- Plastic Surgery Procedures