Questions and Caveats in Antigen-Defined Membranous Nephropathy.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40424085.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1681/ASN.0000000769 and PMC identifier 12342106.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Remarkable progress has been made in the discovery of autoantigens in membranous nephropathy. With increasing testing for membranous antigens in daily practice, it is important to consider the varying strength of associations between certain antigens and underlying conditions. This review explores questions and caveats that arise when assessing results of membranous antigen testing. Specifically, we will discuss: ( 1 ) discrepancy between tissue antigen and clinical scenario, focusing on phospholipase A2 receptor; ( 2 ) one antigen≠one clinical condition, i.e ., the heterogeneity of membranous antigens seen in one clinical condition (such as in sarcoidosis), and conversely, heterogeneity of conditions associated with one antigen (such as for neural epidermal growth factor-like 1); ( 3 ) rare presence of multiple membranous-associated antigens in tissue or blood (such as with antiprotocadherin 7); and ( 4 ) lupus membranous nephritis-related antigens and their influence on diagnosis or treatment.
Medical subject headings
- Glomerulonephritis, Membranous
- Autoantigens