Identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias in the safety net.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40473916.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41746-025-01732-w and PMC identifier 12141433.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Algorithmic bias occurs when predictive model performance varies meaningfully across sociodemographic classes, exacerbating systemic healthcare disparities. NYC Health + Hospitals, an urban safety net system, assessed bias in two binary classification models in our electronic medical record: one predicting acute visits for asthma and one predicting unplanned readmissions. We evaluated differences in subgroup performance across race/ethnicity, sex, language, and insurance using equal opportunity difference (EOD), a metric comparing false negative rates. The most biased classes (race/ethnicity for asthma, insurance for readmission) were targeted for mitigation using threshold adjustment, which adjusts subgroup thresholds to minimize EOD, and reject option classification, which re-classifies scores near the threshold by subgroup. Successful mitigation was defined as 1) absolute subgroup EODs <5 percentage points, 2) accuracy reduction <10%, and 3) alert rate change <20%. Threshold adjustment met these criteria; reject option classification did not. We introduce a Supplementary Playbook outlining our approach for low-resource bias mitigation.