Adjuvant Radiation vs Endocrine Therapy After Lumpectomy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Analysis of Real-World Survival Outcomes.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40478341.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1245/s10434-025-17532-1 and PMC identifier 12284887.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We examined whether adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) monotherapy offers comparable overall survival (OS) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) monotherapy following lumpectomy in women aged ≥ 65 years with favorable early stage breast cancer. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, diagnosed with ER+/HER2-, cT1-2, N0 breast cancer, who underwent lumpectomy, were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox Proportional Hazards models evaluated OS differences across RT-only and ET-only groups. The final cohort included 91,505 patients, with 11.8% receiving RT alone and 29.5% receiving ET only. Median follow-up was 67.6 months. ET-only patients were less likely to have a comorbidity score of 0 (ET 75.4% versus RT 80.8%; p < 0.001). Patients in the ET-only group had slightly larger tumors [ET 1.0 cm (0.7-1.5 cm) versus RT 0.9 cm (0.6-1.3 cm); p < 0.001] and were less likely to have grade 3 tumors (ET 7.0% versus RT 8.4%; p < 0.001). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher 5 year OS for RT-only patients compared with ET-only (RT 88.9% versus ET 85.8%; p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed when stratified on the basis of age group (all log rank p < 0.05). In the adjusted multivariable analysis, RT-only remained associated with a slightly better OS than ET-only [ET ref, RT hazards ratio 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.97)]. For older patients with early stage, ER+/HER2- breast cancer who undergo lumpectomy, patients receiving RT-only had a small survival advantage over patients receiving ET-only, which may or may not be clinically relevant. Further comparisons of RT-only versus ET-only may be warranted in this unique population.