Youth Detention and Incarceration Facilities in the United States (2010 to February 2023): Mapping Closure Intents and Implementation.

Johnson, Emily J; Pluckebaum, Hunter; Martin, Karin D; Danielson, Benjamin; Majercin, Brenda; Capestany, Sheila Ater; Lyons, Vivian H · Am J Public Health · 2025

other · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

<b>Objectives.</b> To characterize youth detention and incarceration facility closure attempts in the United States from January 2010 to February 2023 and inform ongoing attempts for facility closure. <b>Methods.</b> We conducted a landscape analysis of youth facilities with stated intent to close during our study period. For each facility, we coded for jurisdiction (state vs local), year of attempt, stated reasons for closure, outcome of the facility (closed, remained open, or other), facility size, and what happened to youths after the facility closed. <b>Results.</b> We identified a total of 118 facilities in 33 states that had committed to closure in our study period. The most cited reasons for the intention to close were cost (69% of facilities), declining numbers (46%), operational and facilities issues (36%), reform (33%), and conditions of confinement and abuse (30%). Sixty-two percent of identified facilities closed (n = 73). <b>Conclusions.</b> Most facilities that had announced closures did close. For facilities that closed, the most commonly cited reasons were cost and decreasing numbers. Reform as a reason was more common in facilities that remained open than closed. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2025;115(8):1299-1307. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308118).

Medical subject headings