Severity of mobility limitation and adverse outcomes in heart failure.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40533148.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325120.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Mobility limitation is prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the dose-response relationship between its severity and adverse outcomes remains unquantified. We conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two prospective Japanese cohort studies, including 2103 hospitalised patients with HF with no exclusion criteria. Mobility limitation at discharge was categorised into four levels: category I (independent outdoor walking), category II (indoor independence but requiring outdoor assistance), category III (requiring indoor assistance) and category IV (unable to walk). The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite of HF rehospitalisation or all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses accounted for age, sex, comorbidities, biomarkers and medications. Among 2820.7 person-years of follow-up, 998 composite outcomes occurred. Incidence rates per 100 person-years for the primary outcome increased with mobility limitation severity: 24.9 (category I), 47.0 (II), 59.3 (III) and 84.8 (IV) (p for trend <0.001). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) using category I as reference were 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.45) for II, 1.39 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.73) for III and 1.71 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.20) for IV. While the graded association was clear for mortality, it was less evident for HF rehospitalisation alone, likely reflecting competing mortality risks. This study demonstrates a strong and graded association between mobility limitation severity and adverse outcomes in HF, suggesting its utility for refined risk stratification.