Q-TWiST Analysis to Assess Benefit-Risk of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40561376.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1200/OP-24-00806.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In ASCENT, sacituzumab govitecan (SG) showed significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than chemotherapy of physician's choice with similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in previously treated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We assessed the benefit-risk of SG versus chemotherapy by integrating patient preferences (health utilities) with clinical benefits in this analysis. Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) methodology was used to compare treatments where survival was partitioned into three health states using the intention-to-treat ASCENT population: (1) toxicity (grade ≥3 TEAE after random assignment and before disease progression), (2) TWiST (progression-free period without grade ≥3 TEAE), and (3) relapse (disease progression until death or end of follow-up, whichever came first). Health state utilities were derived from published literature. Q-TWiST was calculated as utility-weighted sum of mean health state durations. The established threshold for relative Q-TWiST improvement considered clinically important is 10% and clearly clinically important is 15%. SG had significantly longer Q-TWiST (8.3 months; 95% CI, 7.6 to 9.1 months) than chemotherapy (4.8 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 5.4 months) in patients with mTNBC, a difference of 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 4.4 months; <i>P</i> < .0001). Relative Q-TWiST improvement with SG was 39.5%, exceeding the clearly clinically important threshold. Q-TWiST benefits of SG over chemotherapy increased over the available 31-month follow-up. Restricted mean time with toxicity was numerically higher with SG versus chemotherapy; this difference stabilized with longer follow-up. The Q-TWiST analysis supports a positive benefit-risk ratio for SG versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated mTNBC. Net benefits of SG continued to accrue over time.