A two-stage machine learning-based risk assessment model for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS): A multi-center modeling study of pooled datasets.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40561687.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Develop a two-stage, machine learning-based thrombolysis risk stratification model from existing medical datasets and electronic health records to predict the risk of early hemorrhagic transformation(HT) and in-hospital mortality(IM) following thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), as well as to monitor changes in risk post-thrombolysis, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making and enhancing the recovery rate of AIS. Patients with AIS admitted to a Grade III Class A hospital between October 2001 and October 2022 were included. We extracted 48 clinical features from the datasets and categorized model features into "pre-thrombolysis" and "post-thrombolysis" stages based on the thrombolysis timing point. Utilizing 5 distinct machine learning algorithms, we separately conducted model training to predict the risk of HT and IM both before and after thrombolysis. By establishing a combined model, we further explored the correlation between pre- and post-thrombolysis risks, with external validation performed on 1,777 patients from geographically distinct hospitals. Model performance was assessed according to a suite of learning metrics, including AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. In the first stage model, the Random Forest model demonstrated the highest performance in predicting HT outcomes (AUC = 0.73), with an external validation cohort AUC of 0.69. For predicting IM outcomes, the XGBoost model performed the best (AUC = 0.78), albeit with an external validation AUC of 0.81. Moving to the second stage, XGBoost excelled in predicting HT outcomes, achieving an AUC of 0.83 in the internal validation cohort and 0.75 in the external validation queue. Regarding IM outcomes in the second stage, XGBoost again proved optimal, yielding an AUC of 0.91 in internal validation and 0.88 in the external validation set. The two-stage machine learning-based model for predicting thrombolysis treatment risks in AIS patients is feasible and effective.
Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
- Machine Learning
- Thrombolytic Therapy