Aging measures and cancer in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40593734.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-60913-z and PMC identifier 12215566.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cancer survivors may have higher biological age (BA) than cancer-free persons (controls). In HRS, we examined the associations of BA with cancer prevalence and mortality. BA was estimated by the Klemera and Doubal method (KDM-BA), phenotypic age (PhenoAge), and subjective age (SA) among 946 cancer survivors and 4555 controls; and by epigenetic clocks (Horvath, Hannum, Levine, GrimAge, Zhang Score (ZS), and methylation-based pace of aging (mPOA)) among 582 cancer survivors and 2805 controls. Age acceleration is estimated as residuals regressed on chronological age. There are significant multivariable associations with cancer prevalence for Hannum, GrimAge, and SA, and ZS (logistic regression), and with mortality for PhenoAge, Hannum, Levine, GrimAge, and ZS in cancer survivors, and for KDM-BA, PhenoAge, and ZS in controls (Cox regression). The strongest association in cancer survivors is for GrimAge (HR per 1 SD = 1.80, p < 0.001). PhenoAge and first- and second-generation epigenetic clocks hold promise for predicting mortality in cancer survivors.
Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
- Aging