The importance of distinguishing between natural and managed tree cover gains in the moist tropics.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40603883.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-59196-1 and PMC identifier 12222686.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Naturally regenerated forests and managed tree systems provide different levels of carbon, biodiversity, and livelihood benefits. Here, we show that tree cover gains in the moist tropics during 1982-2015 were 56% ± 3% naturally regenerated forests and 27% ± 2.6% managed tree systems, with these differences in forest type, not only natural conditions (climate, soil, and topography), driving observed carbon recovery rates. The remaining 17% ± 3% likely represents small, unmanaged tree patches within non-forest cover types. Achieving global forest restoration goals requires robust monitoring, reporting, and verification of forest types established by restoration initiatives.
Medical subject headings
- Trees
- Tropical Climate
- Forests
- Conservation of Natural Resources
- Forestry