Lumbar Endplate Hounsfield Units Enhance Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Subsidence Prediction Compared to Trabecular Hounsfield Units Alone.

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort analysis.Objective(1) Develop a novel computed tomography (CT)-based assessment of endplate bone density (EP-HU), (2) Determine if EP-HU was a stronger predictor than trabecular HU for subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsAll adult patients who underwent single-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions at an academic center between 2017-2022 were retrospectively identified. EP-HU was calculated from a 2 mm superior and inferior endplate region on the preoperative mid sagittal CT scans, accounting for surface undulations. Lumbar vertebral HUs (trabecular region) were determined in a standard fashion on axial CT. EP-HU + vertebral HU served as an aggregate bone quality metric. Interbody subsidence (≥2 mm threshold) was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of 1 year CT scans. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared subsidence based on CT bone metrics.ResultsA total of 114 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in fusion or reoperation rate based on subsidence occurrence. Both vertebral HU (<i>P</i> = .012) and EP-HU (<i>P</i> < .001) were associated with subsidence. In receiver operating curves, EP-HU was more optimal for subsidence prediction than vertebral HU, but the aggregate metric further optimized the specificity and total area under the curve. In a predictive logistic regression model EP-HU + vertebral HU (aggregate HU < 515 odds ratio: 7.82, <i>P</i> < .001) was a strong independent predictor of subsidence.ConclusionPreoperative calculation of EP-HUs in addition to vertebral HUs may enhance prediction of TLIF subsidence where aggregate endplate and vertebral HU < 515 can be used to identify high risk patients.