Effect of electrical stimulation on functional recovery of lower limbs in patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40713045.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089702 and PMC identifier 12306215.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to summarise the existing literature about enhancing muscle strength, lower limb function and self-reported function by electrical stimulation (ES) relative to conventional physical therapy following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to assess the comprehensive treatment effects of ES via meta-analysis. Systematic review, meta-analysis. This study systematically searched five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure), covering records from their inception until February 2024, adhering to a predefined search strategy. Two independent reviewers extracted and synthesised the relevant data using RevMan software (V.5.3). Due to identified heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis calculated the effect sizes concerning lower limb function outcomes as standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. A total of 15 studies involving 1583 patients (between the ages of 15 and 50 years) were included. Meta-analysis results indicated that the ES group could improve the lower limb comprehensive function compared with the control group (CG) based on four clinical tests: the muscle strength (SMD=0.55, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.95, p=0.008, I<sup>2</sup>=74%), the range of motion (SMD=1.10, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.79, p=0.002, I<sup>2</sup>=89%), the Lysholm scale (SMD=1.05, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.73, p=0.003, I<sup>2</sup>=91%) and the visual analogue scale (SMD=0.87, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.37, p=0.006, I<sup>2</sup>=75%). However, there were no significant differences between the CG and the ES group in terms of leg circumference (SMD=0.61, 95% CI -0.78 to 2.00, p=0.39, I<sup>2</sup>=87%). Adjunctive ES has the potential to enhance early-phase ACLR rehabilitation outcomes, particularly by improving muscle strength, lower limb function and self-reported function, despite the use of different ES modalities. CRD42024549752.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Lower Extremity
- Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries