A novel incision design for Vibrant SoundBridge®︎ implantation prior to auricular reconstruction for microtia.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40729330.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0327240 and PMC identifier 12306728.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to present and evaluate a surgical approach for placing a Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB) device prior to auricular reconstruction in patients with microtia atresia. The goal was to determine whether an incision line for VSB implantation, located sufficiently posterior to the planned area of auricular reconstruction, could prevent interference with subsequent auricular surgeries and ensure stable hearing outcomes. We retrospectively examined four patients with unilateral microtia who underwent VSB implantation before auricular reconstruction. The incision line was placed approximately 5 cm posterior to the posterior edge of the temporomandibular joint, ensuring that it remained at least 2 cm away from the future area of auricular reconstruction. The VSB implantation procedure involved skin incision, subperiosteal dissection, mastoidectomy, and placement of the VSB implant, with a floating mass transducer attached to the head of the stapes. More than a year later, two-stage auricular reconstruction was performed. All patients underwent successful auricular reconstruction after VSB implantation. During the first stage of costal cartilage grafting, subcutaneous pockets were created without encountering congestion or compromised skin flaps, and the grafted cartilage maintained a good contour. In the second stage of auricular elevation, the mastoid fascial flap was elevated with adequate blood flow, and careful dissection prevented exposure or damage to the VSB device. Postoperatively, the reconstructed auricles exhibited stable contour. Audiometric evaluation revealed no deterioration in hearing outcomes, indicating that the VSB device worked well. This method allows safe and effective VSB implantation prior to auricular reconstruction, without hindering subsequent procedures. By maintaining an appropriate distance between the incision line and planned area of reconstruction, early hearing rehabilitation and successful auricular reconstruction can be achieved. This approach may serve as a practical standard for treating patients with microtia atresia who require early hearing intervention.
Medical subject headings
- Congenital Microtia
- Plastic Surgery Procedures