Accuracy and Efficacy of Intra-articular Knee Injections/Aspirations Under Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guidance: A Systematic Review.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40729535.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002803.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to review the current literature on the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound- and landmark-guided intra-articular knee injections. A systematic review was performed following the Cochrane process from April 2023 to August 2023 utilizing PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Branched logic was used to include articles containing terms regarding the knee AND ultrasound AND injections. Two authors screened studies for eligibility, and any disagreement was resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Risk-of-bias assessments were performed. A total of 13 studies were included in the review. Cumulative accuracies amounted to 95.4% (356/373) versus 82.0% (268/327) for ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided intra-articular knee injections/aspirations, respectively. All but one study looking at efficacy showed significantly improved outcomes in the ultrasound-guided injection/aspiration groups. This systematic review provides data to support that ultrasound-guided intra-articular knee injections/aspirations are more accurate and efficacious than landmark-guided intra-articular knee injections/aspirations. Level I - systematic review.
Medical subject headings
- Ultrasonography, Interventional
- Knee Joint
- Osteoarthritis, Knee