Preserving and Promoting Clinical Trial Representativeness: A Review of Existing Strategies and the Path Forward.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40736748.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2421.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite major advancements in cardiovascular clinical research, underrepresentation in cardiovascular clinical trials persists, limiting generalizability, access to novel therapies, and equitable care. Policymakers, funding bodies, researchers, and professional societies have increasingly acknowledged the scientific importance of representation of the intended use population in cardiovascular clinical trials through policies and incentives, yet significant challenges remain. Achieving meaningful representation requires more than meeting enrollment targets, it demands the integration of best practices into trial design, including tailored recruitment strategies, diverse leadership, standardized demographic data collection, and clear accountability metrics. This review synthesizes the latest policies and initiatives concerning representation in clinical research and provides a strategic framework to ensure scientific validity of clinical trials by operationalizing broad representation at all levels. A coordinated approach among stakeholders is needed to address the scientific value of trial representation of the intended use population.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Trials as Topic
- Patient Selection
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Biomedical Research