Scoping review of the utilization of wearable devices in pediatric and young adult oncology.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40745222.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41746-025-01842-5 and PMC identifier 12313918.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
This review summarizes the current literature on the use of wearable devices for collecting physiological data in pediatric and young adult (0-25 years) oncology. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase, focusing on pediatric and young adult patients with a cancer diagnosis, and utilizing a wearable device during and/or after treatment. Of the 77 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 61 studies primarily used wearable devices as a tool to monitor physiological changes in an interventional or observational setting. Only 16 studies integrated wearable devices as an active component of the intervention. The most reported wearable device brands were ActiGraph (19, 24.7%), FitBit (14, 18.2%), Ambulatory Monitoring Inc. (11, 14.3%) and Philips Respironics (10, 13%). This scoping review offers valuable insights into the current use of wearable devices in pediatric and young adult (0-25 years) oncology but also reveals notable gaps in the literature.