Clinical Efficacy of Biologics and ATAD in NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: A Phenotype-Based Comparative Study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40752740.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.038.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The emergence of biologics has challenged the traditional role of aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) in treating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, raising the million-dollar question: "Which treatment is right for which patient?" However, comparative efficacy data and phenotype-based strategies remain scarce. To compare the efficacy of omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, ATAD, and their combinations in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, and to propose phenotype-based treatment recommendations. This retrospective study included 70 adult patients diagnosed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease who had received treatment for at least 6 months. Outcomes included Asthma Control Test score, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score, smell/taste score, blood eosinophils, oral corticosteroid use, and emergency department visits. Phenotypes were identified via hierarchical clustering using Factor Analysis for Mixed Data and Ward's method. Sex (Cramér's V = 0.10), age (eta squared = 0.005), and body mass index (epsilon squared = 0.001) were similar across treatment groups. Improvements were observed in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (effect size [ES] = 2.0), eosinophils (ES = 1.6), Asthma Control Test score (ES = -2.1), oral corticosteroid use (ES = 1.0), loss of smell or taste score (ES = 0.7), and emergency department visits (ES = 0.3) in the ATAD + biologic group; Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (ES = 1.76), Asthma Control Test score (ES = 2.31), and oral corticosteroid use (ES = 0.86) in the omalizumab group; eosinophils (ES = 2.81) and emergency department visits (ES = 0.69) in the benralizumab group; and loss of smell or taste score (ES = 0.88) in the mepolizumab group. Among the 3 phenotype groups identified through hierarchical clustering, cluster 1 benefited most from ATAD + biologic, cluster 2 from biologics, and cluster 3 from ATAD. Each treatment demonstrated specific benefits, but combination therapy provided the most comprehensive clinical outcomes. Phenotype-guided strategies may optimize therapeutic decisions: ATAD for mild, biologics for moderate, and combination therapy for severe phenotypes.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Desensitization, Immunologic
- Biological Products
- Asthma, Aspirin-Induced
- Aspirin
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents