"Scarcity," "Futility," and "Moral Distress": A Case Analysis of the Challenges of Sound Ethical Description.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40754014.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.025.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Appropriate use of ethical terminology is critical to effective, goal-concordant care, particularly for patients who are critically ill or nearing the end of life. In this case analysis, we describe how the ethical terms "scarcity," "futility," and "moral distress" were used in ways that failed to accurately capture the clinical situation, and likely favored the viewpoints of the clinical team. While careful attention to accurate clinical and ethical terminology is challenging in cases like this, we argue it is essential to communicate honestly and effectively with patients and families grappling with difficult decisions in these contexts.
Medical subject headings
- Terminal Care
- Medical Futility
- Terminology as Topic
- Morals