Editorial Commentary: Shifting From Redundancy to Rigor in Orthopaedic Large Language Model Research.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40774567.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.020.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) research in musculoskeletal medicine is growing rapidly, but much of the literature remains methodologically weak and highly repetitive. To address this, the orthopaedic LLM research community needs a shared benchmarking infrastructure/framework to evaluate models on clinically grounded tasks using fixed-prompt templates and transparent scoring. Drawing on established LLM benchmarking practices, such a framework would enable reproducibility, discourage cherry-picking, and promote meaningful innovation. Like surgical registries in orthopaedics, open LLM benchmarks can clarify performance, guide adoption, and ensure that progress is both measurable and clinically relevant.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedics
- Biomedical Research
- Language