Aortic Valve-Sparing Root Operation in Patients With Marfan and Loeys-Dietz Syndrome.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40789501.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.07.025.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) in patients with Marfan (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). Additionally, the study analyzed operative factors, including the impact of graft selection. All patients with either MFS (158; 84%) or LDS (30; 16%) who underwent VSRR were included in a retrospective analysis from a transatlantic registry. Among 188 patients who had VSRR, 10 (5%) required reoperation on the aortic valve (7 with MFS and 3 with LDS; hazard ratio [HR] for LDS, 3.25; P = .078). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 10 years was 94% for patients with MFS and 87% for patients with LDS. A total of 21 patients (11%; 19 with MFS and 2 with LDS) experienced aortic valve regurgitation ≥2 (HR for LDS, 0.78; P = .755). One patient died 3 days after a severe stroke, and 7 patients died during follow-up (7 with MFS and 1 with LDS; HR LDS, 1.82; P = .595). During follow-up, 22 patients required an aortic reintervention (19 with MFS and 3 with LDS; P = .752). Patients with a Valsalva graft experienced significantly fewer total aortic reinterventions compared with patients with a straight graft (HR for Valsalva graft, 0.04; P < .001). VSRR shows excellent midterm outcomes in patients with MFS and LDS. There are no outcome differences between patients with MFS and patients with LDS. The use of a Valsalva graft may be considered to reduce aortic reintervention rates in patients with MFS and LDS.
Medical subject headings
- Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
- Marfan Syndrome
- Aortic Valve
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation