Digital Well-Being Training With Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40824577.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3888 and PMC identifier 12362274.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
High levels of health care professional (HCP) distress portend negative consequences for HCPs and health systems. To evaluate whether a 13-week digital well-being training could improve Mexican HCP distress and well-being. This 2-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 2023 and March 2024 with 13-week postintervention and 37-week follow-up end points. Participants included 2315 adults with no previous well-being training experience who worked in 762 participating health care facilities across 7 Mexican states. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using stratified permuted blocks to well-being training or wait-list control. Outcomes assessors and study data analyst were masked to condition assignment. Assessments and intervention were conducted remotely. The digital well-being training consisted of nine 2-hour zoom sessions and 13 weeks of the Healthy Minds Program smartphone app structured on the premise that well-being skills can be strengthened through psychoeducation and contemplative practice. The primary prespecified outcomes were participant-reported distress (aggregate of z-scored National Institutes of Health Toolbox perceived stress, and Perceived Stress and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System anxiety and depression scales; mean = 0, SD = 1) and the World Health Organization-5 measure of well-being (range 0-25). Among 2315 participants, 1693 (73.1%) identified as female; 778 (33.4%) nurses, 736 (31.7%) physicians, 187 (8.1%) psychologists, 183 (7.9%) administrators, 154 (6.7%) dentists, 75 (3.2%) social workers, 64 (2.8%) nutritionists, 55 (2.4%) laboratory technicians, 40 (1.7%) physical therapists, 29 (1.3%) health promoters, and 8 (<0.1%) other health professionals; the mean (SD) age was 34.7 (11.4) years. Relative to control, in intention-to-treat analyses the intervention group reported 13-week reductions in distress (adjusted standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.24; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.16) and increases in well-being (adjusted SMD, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.35) that increased in magnitude at 37-week follow-up (distress, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.28; well-being, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.50). Primary outcomes were robust in sensitivity analyses. There were 10 adverse events (intervention: 0.05% [6 of 1157]; control: 0.04% [4 of 1158]). This randomized clinical trial found that scalable digital well-being training modestly improved Mexican HCP distress and well-being compared with a wait-list condition. As HCPs are essential to public health and report high levels of distress that interfere with their ability to provide optimal care, well-being training may be an avenue to better supporting HCPs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05767970.