Visceral Adiposity Thresholds for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: A Simplified Biomarker-Driven Model.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40825749.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/oby.24367 and PMC identifier 12477109.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
VAT volume is a critical determinant of cardiometabolic risk, yet population-specific thresholds and accessible predictive tools remain undefined. Using US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, we analyzed dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived VAT volume. Threshold effects and sex/ethnicity interactions were evaluated via multivariable regression, while LASSO regularization and ROC analyses identified a simplified predictive model. A VAT volume threshold of 327.0 cm<sup>3</sup> stratified CVD risk, distinguishing compensatory from pathological adiposity. The high-VAT group exhibited elevated CVD prevalence (2.41% vs. 1.12%, p = 0.016), metabolic dysregulation, and socioeconomic disparities. Males showed higher risk thresholds than females (387.5 vs. 312.0 cm<sup>3</sup>, p-interaction = 0.029). Non-Hispanic White participants and multiracial groups exhibited abrupt risk escalation above 399.5 and 270.0 cm<sup>3</sup> (aOR = 1.08-1.12, p < 0.001), absent in non-Hispanic Black individuals and Hispanic individuals. A tri-biomarker model (waist circumference + triglycerides + apolipoprotein B) achieved near-equivalent accuracy to DXA-based VAT quantification (AUC = 0.821 vs. 0.819, p = 0.66), with high sensitivity (80.95% vs. 69.05%) and cost-effectiveness. This study establishes the first sex-specific and ethnicity-specific VAT thresholds for CVD risk stratification and provides a clinically actionable tool for visceral adiposity screening.
Medical subject headings
- Intra-Abdominal Fat
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Adiposity
- Obesity, Abdominal