Impact of Robotic-Assisted Technology on Joint Awareness Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40846123.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.024.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Joint awareness reflects patient satisfaction and prosthesis integration after arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate joint awareness differences between robotic-assisted joint arthroplasty (R-JA) and manual joint arthroplasty (M-JA) across various joint sites and follow-up periods. A systematic search was conducted in four major databases for studies published between January 1, 2012, and February 1, 2025. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing R-JA and M-JA were included. Studies reporting the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were selected, with data extracted and categorized by follow-up duration: short-term (< one year), mid-term (one to two years), and long-term (> two years). Descriptive statistics and a random-effects model were applied. A total of 39 studies were included, encompassing 13,289 joints, comprising 10,037 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), 2,746 total hip arthroplasties (THAs), and 506 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). The meta-analysis indicated that R-TKA achieved higher FJS-12 than M-TKA across all follow-up periods (short-term: mean difference (MD): 5.72, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.37 to 10.07; mid-term: MD: 3.27, 95% CI: 0.11 to 6.42; long-term: MD: 8.37, 95% CI: 0.86 to 15.89). Similarly, R-THA consistently outperformed M-THA in joint awareness across all follow-up periods (within one year: MD: 6.60, 95% CI: 3.47 to 9.74; one to two years: MD: 7.19, 95% CI: 1.21 to 13.17; over two years: MD: 1.92, 95% CI: 0.46 to 3.39). The R-UKA demonstrated superior FJS-12 in short-term (MD: 7.88, 95% CI: 4.02 to 11.74) and mid-term (MD: 12.96, 95% CI: 7.27 to 18.66) follow-ups, but no significant difference was observed in the long-term follow-up (MD: 9.06, 95% CI: -7.76 to 25.89). This study found that R-JA improved joint awareness after total joint arthroplasty, with a consistent advantage in TKA and THA across all follow-up periods, while the benefits in UKA were limited to within 2 years.