Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Radiation Therapy Alone in T1-2 Oropharyngeal Cancer With Low-Volume Neck Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study Using the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40848943.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.08.040.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The benefit of adding concurrent systemic therapy to definitive radiation therapy (RT) for patients with T1-2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and limited neck node involvement is uncertain. This study investigates whether chemotherapy (CRT) in patients with early-stage (T1-2) low-volume nodal disease (Union for International Cancer Control Seventh Edition N1-2b) improves overall survival (OS) compared with RT alone. A cohort study of data from the prospective Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register leveraged variation in receiving CRT based on the health care region. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to balance baseline characteristics between patients from regions favoring CRT and those receiving RT alone. OS and loco-regional control (LRC) were compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models. Separate matching and analyses were conducted for patients with T1-2N1-2a (cohort N1-2a, ie, single node < 6 cm) and T1-2N2b disease (cohort N2b, ie, multiple nodes < 6 cm). A total of 1507 patients with T1-2N1-2b OPSCC were included. After propensity score matching, cohort N1-2a consisted of 262 patients and cohort N2b of 692 patients. OS was similar between CRT and RT alone in both cohorts, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.57 (95% CI, 0.68-3.87; p = .17) for cohort N1-2a, and an HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.66-1.35; p = .77) for cohort N2b. LRC was also similar between CRT and RT in cohort N1-2a (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.34-2.78]; p = .98). In cohort N2b, a statistical interaction (p < .001) was found with age, with a benefit of CRT for patients aged ≤70 years (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.16-0.58]), but not for patients aged >70 years (HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.50-4.39]). The difference in LRC was driven by failures at the primary tumor site. Exploratory analyses suggested a selective benefit of CRT for patients with T2N2b. The results of this large, robust, national register suggest that RT alone is a safe treatment option for patients with T1-2N1-2a OPSCC. In patients with multiple neck nodes (N2b) aged ≤70 years, CRT improved LRC but not overall survival.
Medical subject headings
- Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
- Chemoradiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell