Assessment of the stopping for right-turning large vehicles policy in Nanjing: Effectiveness and determinants.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Stopping for Right-Turning Large Vehicles Policy in Nanjing, designed to mitigate accidents attributed to blind spots and delayed braking of large trucks at intersections. Using high-resolution conflict data from four signalized intersections in Jiangning District, collected via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and roadside video, the research employs K-means clustering for conflict severity classification and binomial Logit regression to identify critical determinants. Results reveal the policy exhibited limited statistical significance in reducing severe conflicts (p > 0.05). Regression analysis quantified four critical determinants: absence of motorized/non-motorized segregation (OR=1.82, + 81.6% severity odds), elevated stop-line speeds (OR=1.32, + 31.9%), failure to yield (OR=2.45, + 145%), and crossing the street within the zebra crossing (OR=0.19, -81.0%). The analysis demonstrates that infrastructural deficiencies and behavioral non-compliance outweigh the policy's standalone impact. Based on these findings, the study proposes a holistic optimization framework integrating physical separation measures, enhanced signage, dynamic traffic signal adjustments, and data-driven enforcement strategies. Methodologically, this study innovatively combines unsupervised learning for conflict categorization, providing a scalable framework for evaluating urban traffic policies. This research underscores the necessity of multi-dimensional interventions-spanning infrastructure, enforcement, and public education-to achieve sustainable improvements in intersection safety. The findings offer actionable insights for policymakers to refine regulatory measures and enhance road safety in rapidly urbanizing environments.