Screening for MASLD and Advanced Fibrosis Among Patients With Obesity: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40879614.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/oby.70005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of various strategies for screening for MASLD-related advanced hepatic fibrosis (fibrosis stage > 2) using the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) in persons with obesity. We created a decision-analytic model comparing three screening strategies: no screening, TE, and FIB-4 followed by TE. We used a Markov transition model to track liver state, with prevalence and transition probabilities specific to the population with obesity. If MASLD was detected, patients were treated with resmetirom. We found an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $234,781 (95% CI: $232,581, $235,608) when comparing TE to no screening with a 10-year interval. We note the ICER of $234,673 (95% CI: $234,033, $235,072) when comparing TE to FIB-4+TE. In multivariate simulations, we found no screening was most likely to be cost-effective for willingness-to-pay for QALY below approximately $250,000. Our results suggest routine screening for MASLD in obesity clinics is not cost-effective with resmetirom as the available treatment. A prescreening with FIB-4 before TE did not increase economic efficiency.
Medical subject headings
- Obesity
- Liver Cirrhosis
- Mass Screening