Editorial Commentary: Stretching the Truth: We Need a Better System to Define Generalized Joint Laxity.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40885346.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.08.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
As the indications and utilization of hip arthroscopy continue to grow, understanding outcomes in unique patient populations is a popular area of research. A specific cohort of interest are those with generalized joint laxity, a group in which instability issues may already be present and of concern for hip arthroscopy. The Beighton score, the standardized scale used to measure joint laxity in patients, presents several issues for its use as a diagnostic indicator, including disagreement on cut-offs, limited focus on lower extremity joints, and questionable validity. Hip arthroscopy has outgrown the single-faceted system, with controversial evidence to characterize this complex group of patients.
Medical subject headings
- Joint Instability
- Arthroscopy
- Hip Joint
Anatomy
- hip