WoundcareVQA: A multilingual visual question answering benchmark dataset for wound care.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40886812.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104888.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Introduce the task of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering, provide baseline performances, and identify areas of future study. A dataset of wound care multimodal multilingual visual question answering (VQA) was created using consumer health questions asked online. Practicing US medical doctors were tasked with providing metadata and expert responses labels. Several instruct-enabled, multilingual visual question answering models (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Qwen-VL) were tested to benchmark performances. Finally, automatic evaluations were tested against domain expert response ratings. A multilingual dataset of 477 wound care cases, 768 responses, 748 images, 3k structured data labels, 1362 translation instances, and 10k judgments was constructed (https://osf.io/xsj5u/). Metadata scores ranged from 0.32-0.78 accuracy depending on classification type; response generation performances 0.06 BLEU, 0.66 BERTScore, 0.45 ROUGE-L in English and 0.12 BLEU, 0.69 BERTScore, and 0.50 ROUGE-L in Chinese. We construct and explore the tasks of multimodal, multilingual VQA. We hope the work here can inspire further research in wound care metadata classification, VQA response generation, and open response automatic evaluation.
Medical subject headings
- Benchmarking
- Wounds and Injuries
- Multilingualism
- Wound Healing