Influence of the Composite allocation Score on racial/ethnic disparities in lung transplantation waitlist outcomes.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40889551.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.08.032.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We examined the influence of the March 2023 Composite Allocation Score (CAS) policy change on lung transplantation (LT) versus waitlist death/deterioration by candidate race/ethnicity. We identified LT candidates listed from 2020 to 2024 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Candidates were categorized by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, or Asian). LT versus waitlist death/deterioration was compared across racial/ethnic groups for candidates listed pre-versus post-CAS. Multivariable competing risk regression, including an interaction term for CAS evaluated whether CAS modified the association between race/ethnicity and waitlist outcomes. Separate competing risk models assessed whether disparities persisted post-CAS. Of 12,478 candidates listed for LT (median age = 63 years; 59.3% men; 71.5% White, 10.3% Black, 14.3% Hispanic, and 3.9% Asian), 9058 candidates were listed pre-CAS and 3420 post-CAS. Post-CAS, the proportion of LT within 6 months increased significantly for Hispanic candidates (80.9% vs 66.8%; P < .001), whereas waitlist death/deterioration decreased for White (3.7% vs 5.8%; P < .001), Black (4.1% vs 7.5%; P = .042), and Hispanic (4.8% vs 8.8%; P < .001) candidates. Competing risk analyses revealed that pre-CAS, Black (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95; P = .001), Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95; P = .001), and Asian (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006) candidates had significantly lower likelihoods of LT compared with White candidates. Interaction term analysis revealed a greater post-CAS increase in LT likelihood for Hispanic compared with White candidates (interaction subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = .002). Post-CAS, no significant disparities in waitlist outcomes remained between racial/ethnic groups. CAS implementation was associated with improved LT access for Hispanic candidates. Race/ethnicity does not predict risk of LT or waitlist death/deterioration in the post-CAS era.
Medical subject headings
- Ethnicity
- Healthcare Disparities
- Lung Transplantation
- Tissue and Organ Procurement
- Waiting Lists
- Racial Groups