Prevention strategies and modifiable risk factors for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the Female, woman and girl Athlete Injury pRevention (FAIR) consensus.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40889819.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2025-109900.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Investigate prevention interventions and potential modifiable risk factors (MRFs) for female/woman/girl athletes' spine, chest, abdominal or pelvic injury and/or pain. Systematic review with meta-analyses, semiquantitative analyses and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, CDSR, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, ERIC. Primary data studies with comparison group(s) assessing the association of prevention interventions and/or MRFs for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain with ≥1 female/woman/girl athlete in each study group. Across 105 studies (n=11 interventions, n=92 MRFs, n=2 both, n=35 female/woman/girl-specific estimates) including 59 833 participants (23.7% females/women/girls) 9 injury/pain outcomes were assessed (n=74 low-back, n=14 back, n=13 neck, n=5 pelvis, n=3 thoracic, n=3 abdominal, n=3 trunk, n=2 rib, n=1 breast). Three prevention strategies (exercise, equipment, rule-change) and 22 MRFs were identified. High risk of confounding bias (Downs and Black quality assessment tool) was present in 92% and 63% of intervention and MRF studies, respectively. Considering female/woman/girl estimates, we performed meta-analyses (standardised mean-difference) on 4 MRFs (body mass, body mass index (BMI), weekly training hours, spinal flexion) for low-back pain (LBP) and semiquantitative analyses for one intervention (exercise), and 3 MRFs (yearly training load, hip motion, hip strength) for LBP. Very low-certainty evidence suggests no difference in body mass (g=0.28, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.62; I<sup>2</sup>=67.7%), BMI (g=0.22, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.69; I<sup>2</sup>=68.2%), weekly training hours (g=0.15, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.58; I<sup>2</sup>=45.6%) or spinal flexion (g=0.27, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.76; I<sup>2</sup>=40.4%) between female/women/girls athletes with and without LBP. There is limited knowledge about prevention interventions or MRFs for female/women/girl athletes' spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain. CRD42024479654.
Medical subject headings
- Athletic Injuries
- Spinal Injuries
- Abdominal Injuries
- Thoracic Injuries
Anatomy
- thoracic spine
- pelvis