An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40919485.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jeo2.70420 and PMC identifier 12411927.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To assess the characteristics and effectiveness of low-cost platelet-rich plasma (LC-PRP) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by evaluating its composition and effect on pain, function, satisfaction, safety and cost-effectiveness. Level IV evidence single-arm prospective cohort pilot study of 20 subjects (30 knees total) with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Two LC-PRP injections were performed, 3 weeks apart. Platelet extraction/yield, patient-reported outcomes and incidence of adverse events were assessed with a primary endpoint of 6 months. A cost-effectiveness analysis of LC-PRP compared to corticosteroid injection was conducted. On average, this LC-PRP preparation method allowed for recovery of 85% of platelets. Significant mean differences in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (total, pain and function) and global assessment score were observed at all follow-up points compared to baseline (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for 1, 3, 6 and 12 months). Satisfaction was noted in 90% of patients at 6 months and 75% of patients at 12 months. No significant adverse events were reported. LC-PRP was less costly ($654 vs. $1308) and yielded more QALYs (0.846 vs. 0.708) than corticosteroid injections. Per injection costs were estimated to be $10 for corticosteroid and $11 for LC-PRP. This pilot study demonstrates that LC-PRP ($11) may significantly benefit patients with knee OA. LC-PRP appears to be a safe, cost-effective means for improving pain and function in knee OA. Level IV.