Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40920036.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/bju.16864.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid 'cookie cutter science' and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Medical subject headings
- Urology
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Systematic Reviews as Topic
- Review Literature as Topic
- Practice Guidelines as Topic