Comparing Generative Artificial Intelligence vs Experts for Detection of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40923191.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/cid/ciaf486.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study compared generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) versus infection control expert for catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) detection. Sensitivity was 95.2% (20/21), and specificity was 76.2% (16/21), improving to 90% with expert review of GenAI output. GenAI is a promising tool to assist in CAUTI surveillance.
Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections
- Artificial Intelligence
- Catheter-Related Infections