In situ laser fenestration for zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A 15-year experience demonstrating its safety, efficacy, and durability.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40934992.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.08.044.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In situ laser fenestration (ISLF) of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is a simple and effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization. However, long-term outcome data for this technique are lacking. This study presents our expanded experience with long-term outcomes of ISLF of the LSA in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). A single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR with LSA revascularization by ISLF was performed (2009-2023). This technique was performed through retrograde percutaneous or open brachial arterial access. A thoracic endograft was deployed in zone 2 followed by ISLF using a 2.3-mm laser. A balloon expandable covered stent was placed across the fenestration and post-dilated. Postoperative clinical follow-up and computed tomography angiography were reviewed to assess our endpoints. The primary endpoint was fenestration-related endoleak reintervention (type Ic or IIIc). Secondary endpoints were early and late stroke rates, LSA stent patency, fenestration-related mortality, and aorta-related mortality. Eighty-one patients were included in our series (48 males [59%]; mean age, 60.9 ±12.8 years). Indication for intervention was type B aortic dissection in 67 patients (82.7%). Ninety-two percent of all interventions were urgent or emergent, with 19 patients presenting with rupture (23.5%). ISLF was successfully performed in all 81 cases. The median operative time was 153 minutes. Postintervention stroke occurred in three patients (3.7%) and spinal cord injury in six patients (7.4%; three transient, three permanent). There were nine operative mortalities (11.1%). The median clinical follow-up was 4.3 years (range, 0-12.6 years), and the median imaging follow-up was 4.3 years (range, 0-12.5 years). Three patients (3.7%) were found to have a type 1c endoleak and underwent distal extension of the LSA stent at 6.6, 23.6, and 30.2 months postoperatively. Importantly, there was no fenestration-related type IIIc endoleak or mortality. Primary LSA stent patency was 100% at 1 year, 96.7% at 5 years, and 91.1% at 10 years. Freedom from fenestration-related endoleak reintervention was 98.4% at 1 year, 93.2% at 5 years, and 93.2% at 10 years. There was only one late aortic-related death (1.4%) secondary to multiorgan failure on postoperative day 77 after visceral debranching. ISLF for LSA revascularization is a safe, reproducible, and durable treatment option in TEVAR requiring proximal seal in zone 2. ISLF carries an excellent technical success rate, low fenestration-related complications, and competitive long-term stent patency. Low stroke rate and short operative time further support ISLF as an effective surgical technique for LSA revascularization.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
- Endovascular Procedures
- Subclavian Artery
- Aorta, Thoracic
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
- Laser Therapy