A Statewide Quality Initiative to Promote Aortic Annular Enlargement: Leading an Evolving Paradigm Shift.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40953788.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.08.049.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Aortic annular enlargement (AAE) represents an important adjunct strategy during aortic valve replacement (AVR), enabling implantation of a larger prosthesis to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch. This study evaluated the results of a statewide quality improvement intervention (QII) to increase AAE adoption, including the novel Y-incision technique. Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, we identified patients undergoing AVR with or without AAE from January 2018 to December 2023, excluding emergent and endocarditis cases. A QII was initiated in September 2021 and again in May 2023 featuring wet laboratory training in AAE techniques. Patients were assigned to pre-QII (before September 2021) and post-QII groups. Primary end points were AVR+AAE incidence and median prosthesis size; secondary end points included 30-day mortality, transfusions, and morbidity. Sensitivity analyses were performed on isolated AVR+AAE cases. A total of 817 patients were included (pre-QII, 330; post-QII, 487), and 11.6% of the audited operative notes were reassigned to the QII Y-incision subgroup. Post-QII patients showed increased AVR+AAE incidence (7% vs 19%; P < .001), with isolated AVR+AAE cases rising from 8% to 23% (P < .001). Median prosthesis size increased from 23 to 25 mm (P < .001). Y-incision adoption rose significantly (20% vs 70%; P < .001), with more surgeons implementing the technique in the post-QII group (18 vs 35). No significant differences were observed in secondary end points. Sensitivity analyses confirmed findings. A pilot QII enhanced AAE adoption during AVR, leading to a larger aortic valve prosthesis without a significant increase in morbidity or mortality. Future research should explore midterm and long-term benefits on patient outcomes, including quality of life and survival.
Medical subject headings
- Quality Improvement
- Aortic Valve
- Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
- Heart Valve Prosthesis