Effects of sprint interval training compared to high intensity interval training on repeated sprint capacity and sport-specific performance in college-aged male tennis players.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40972118.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0332705 and PMC identifier 12449013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study compared the effects of sprint interval training (SIT) versus high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on repeated sprint capacity and sport-specific performance in male tennis players. Thirty collegiate tennis players (age: 22.39 ± 1.64 years) were randomly assigned to SIT (n = 15) or HIIT (n = 15) groups for an 8-week training intervention. Performance and physiological parameters were assessed using repeated sprint ability (RSA) test, hit-and-turn tennis test, and tennis-specific endurance test. Key metrics included maximal completed level, total time to exhaustion (TTE), repeated sprint parameters (RSATT, RSAbest, Sdec), maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O₂max), ventilatory efficiency, and tennis performance index. Significant group × time interactions were observed for maximal completed level (F(1, 28)=22.649, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.89), RSATT (F(1, 28) =39.74, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.89), and ball accuracy (F(1, 28)=13.811, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.901). The SIT group showed greater improvements in maximal completed level (4.00 ± 0.28 vs. 2.14 ± 0.28, p < .001), RSATT (-4.84 ± 0.33s vs. -1.87 ± 0.33s, p < 0.001), and ball accuracy (12.85 ± 1.71% vs. 3.86 ± 1.71%, p < 0.001). Both groups improved significantly in [Formula: see text]O₂max (SIT: 52.84 ± 4.22 to 64.50 ± 3.85 mL.min-1.kg-1; HIIT: 51.79 ± 5.15 to 59.6 ± 4.44 mL.min-1.kg-1, p < 0.001) and TTE (SIT: ηp2 = 0.825; HIIT: ηp2 = 0.59). Time to the onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) and second ventilatory threshold (VT2) showed significant main effects of time (p < .001) without group differences. While both protocols improved aerobic fitness, SIT demonstrated superior effectiveness in enhancing tennis-specific performance, particularly in repeated sprint ability and technical stability. These findings suggest that SIT might be a more time-efficient training strategy for improving sport-specific performance in tennis players.
Medical subject headings
- Athletic Performance
- High-Intensity Interval Training
- Running
- Tennis