Reply to Sun et al.: Methodological clarifications regarding "Ultratape and sutures combination versus conventional sutures in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 6-month retrospective matched cohort study".
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41029876.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1186/s13018-025-06198-w.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We thank Sun et al. for their interest in our article, "UltraTape and Sutures Combination Versus Conventional Sutures in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 6-Month Retrospective Matched Cohort Study", and for their constructive comments. Their concerns regarding temporal bias and methodology merit clarification. Here, we detail our study design and efforts to minimize bias, and discuss the interpretation and clinical value of real-world, retrospective cohort data in the context of new surgical technologies.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroscopy
- Suture Techniques
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Sutures
- Rotator Cuff
Anatomy
- shoulder